Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jason Averbook's avatar

You nailed it: She who has (excellent, accessible, usable) content WINS.

Not just content for today, but content organized for tomorrow’s questions, people, and machines.

That “taxonomy” you mentioned? It’s not a scary word. It’s the foundation.

It’s how we make knowledge findable by design—not by accident or memory.

And yes… those “drawers” full of outdated frameworks and forgotten skills libraries? We’re still paying the interest on that debt.

Let’s retire the idea that this is just an L&D or HR problem. This is a business continuity issue. A workforce intelligence issue. A trust issue.

Appreciate you being in this work for the long haul—and still pushing it forward

Expand full comment
Andrea DiPetta's avatar

I've been waiting for someone to say this as well as Jason has. For those of us who have been around L&D since before the LMS, (I typed my content on a non-electric typewriter and used white-out for typos) this has always the game.... SHE WHO HAS (EXCELLENT) CONTENT WINS. If you want any system, including a human system, to be able to pull out the right data, you have to file the data into some sort of (big word coming...) "taxonomy" so that everyday people (not just HR people (people managers, employees, people you hire 10 years from now, robots) can find it. BTW... this is also the hardest part of building a skills-based organization (also something we were doing many moons ago)....defining the skills that everyone can agree upon now and forever. The problem with the systems that those "dinosaurs" created is that they are still in someone's drawer somewhere...Cheers!

Expand full comment

No posts